Adherence to commercial food thickener in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia.

BACKGROUND: Oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD), a common symptom in the elderly, uses commercial thickener (CT) as part of its treatment. This is often accompanied of dislike and poor compliance. AIM: Describe adherence to CT and possible differences according to dwelling location in an area of influence of approximately 400.0000 inhabitants. METHODS: Cohort prospective observational study. Randomized patients from Nutrition and Dietetic (NDU)-database (4 calls-interviews/year). VARIABLES: Age, diagnostic, gender, dwelling/location: Home (H) / Nursing Home (NH), viscosity (nectar, honey, pudding), days with CT. Adherence measured with a questionnaire, considering implementation of treatment by combining CT use and consumption data, categorised in three groups good, moderate and poor. Change in patterns (improvement, maintenance, worsening) and non-adherence reasons. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-eight patients recruited with indicated viscosity: Nectar 39.7%, honey 29.3% and pudding 30.8%. Average age of 82.6 ± 11.1 years; 57.8% women (46.4% at H vs. 67% at NH, p < 0.01). Dwelling/location: 80 (47.6%) live at H and 88 (52.4%) at NH. Days with CT prior study were 509 ± 475.28. Implementation found in first call: good in 50%, moderate in 20.2% and poor in 29.8%. At first call, adherence parameters were more favourable in NH compared to H. However these parameters were reversed during the study period as there was an improvement at H vs. NH. Also in terms of change in patterns a significant improvement of implementation was found in patients living at H, 31.1% vs. those living at NH, 15.7%, p < 0.05. CT persistence throughout study was 89.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Low adherence to CT found in our community. Telephone follow-up resulted in improved adherence, especially in the H population. Our data provides valuable insights into the variability and changes in CT adherence among patients with OD. Adherence is complex and subject to many factors and dwelling/location is one of them. This study reveals the need to approach CT treatment for OD differently in NH.

Differences in the use of food textures in oropharyngeal dysphagia according to the place of living.

BACKGROUND&AIMS: Modifying solid/liquid foods is the main treatment in oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD). Commercial Thickener (CT) for treatment is subsidized by health system and is delivered to patient's place of living, once is managed by our hospital Nutrition-Dietetics Unit (NDU). AIM: To describe the patterns of texture for foods/liquids follow in patients with OD who are treated with CT. METHODS: Cohort prospective study. Randomized patients from NDU-database followed throughout 2018 (4 calls-interviews/year). Variables; age, diagnostic, gender, residence type: Home(H)/Nursing Home(NH), thickener manager (patient, family member or caregiver), education, days with commercial thickener (CT), thickener regimen established by Volume/Viscosity test: nectar (N), honey (HY), pudding (P), type of diets; measured by FOIS scale and texture; pureed (PD); soft (SD); mixed (P&S/D); regular (RD), risk foods consumption (RFC), complete diet intake (CI), changes in; diets, intake and RFC. RESULTS: Analysed 204 patients, aged 85 years; (IQR: 78-90), from which 57.8% were women. Residence: 43.6% H/56.4% NH. Days with CT median 380 days (IQR: 153-682). A proper viscosity guideline was indicated in 168 patients: N 37.3%, HY 20.6% and P 24.5%. In 36 patients (17.5%) there were no indications, 75% of them coming from primary care. Despite this, 184 patients (90%) referred a concrete indication; N 35.8%, HY 26% and P 28.4%. The concordance between indicated and referred viscosity was significantly higher at H (Kappa 0.798) compared to NH (Kappa 0.428), p < 0.0001. FOIS: 65.7% followed the total oral diet of a single consistency. Diet textures: PD 66.7%, SD 2.9%, P&S/D 21.1%, RD 9.3%. Difference in PD given in NH 86.1% vs H 41.6%, p < 0.001. Under N viscosity different diet distributions, PD 28.6%H vs 71% NH, p < 0.05. CI in 66.7% with no difference among NH/H. RFC similar but higher consumption of jellies at NH, p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: According to this study the place of living determines a better approach to OD treatment. Viscosity and diet texture are more restricted in NH with worse compliance of indicated regimens. Increasing variety in diets and reassessment of OD treatment is desirable.

Prevalence of dysphagia in a regional hospital setting: Acute care hospital and a geriatric sociosanitary care hospital: A cross-sectional study.

RATIONALE: Oropharyngeal Dysphagia (OD) is a symptom commonly found in hospitalized patients and related to a vast array of clinical diagnosis and to high morbidity and mortality that is becoming very important to identify. Our aim was to assess the prevalence of OD in our hospital setting. METHODS: Cross-sectional randomized study to determine the prevalence of dysphagia in an acute care hospital (ACH) and long term care hospital (LTCH). Multiquestionnaire test performed to assess dysphagia with the bedside validated volume-viscosity swallow test (V-VST test), in those with the validated swallowing ability test, eating assessment tool (EAT-10)>3. Variables; sex, age (>65 y), diagnosis, mininutritional assessment (MNA), previous diagnosis of dysphagia (including any recommendations given before), EAT-10, V-VST, presence of dysphagia, type of diet prescribed (basal or therapeutic), use of thickener and diet texture (pureed with liquids allowed, pureed without liquids, soft diet, normal). RESULTS: N = 200 patients (100 in each centre). 49% male; Age = 81.1 [65-101] years; Diagnostics: medical 70%/surgery 30%. Dysphagia analysis: 42% patients showed an EAT-10 > 3 so the V-VST test was done in these patients resulting in global prevalence of 28.5% (95% CI: 22.7-35.1). Among centres no significant differences were observed: ACH 30% (95% CI: 14-34) and LTCH 27% (95% CI: 19-36). Highlighting a greater concentration of dysphagia in Orthogeriatric and Neurological patients in the LTCH than in ACH (Pneumology, Internal Medicine and Cardiology). MNA analysis: 27% normal 44% risk 29% malnutrition. Malnutrition present in 50.9% of patients diagnosed with dysphagia, 44% in those at risc (EAT-10 +) and 27.6% in those without risc or dysphagia (p = 0.020). From the novo patients, 75.4% did not have adequate complete adapted treatment (diet and thickener). Only 13.3% had their thickener prescribed. In those with history of dysphagia 37% had an inappropriate treatment. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of OD matches with what is described in the literature. There is a high proportion of infradiagnostic and overall inadequate treatment, more than a third of patients do not have their diet adapted correctly. It is important to identify this symptom to treat it properly and to raise awareness among sanitary professionals for best adaptation of treatment.